Saturday, October 21, 2017
I have always had a tendency to be too kind to people who don't deserve it because somehow I decided at one point in my life, the people who act as if they least deserve kindness are the ones who need it most. I don't know how healthy an attitude this is to hold. Unless you are a very strong person who has mastered the art of pure detachment, it can cause a lot of heartache. You invest your energy in people who are emotional leeches. They take and take, but never really give anything back. They only give enough of themselves to make a person think that genuine feelings of affection and respect exist, but its not true. It's false progress, false feelings, utter manipulation on the part of one person towards another. It's a method of stringing someone along someone who provides support and love without ever having to pay the piper--without ever having to be real and true and a supportive entity to the other person.
I think the people who are the most awful in situations like these are those that know exactly what they are doing. The calculated manipulation to get exactly what they want from another person without having to return anything back is really kind of evil. But, for the longest time, I was so blind to acknowledging that some people are inherently not good, that I mitigated everything they did by attributing their behaviors to other reasons--plausible, reasonable motivations for behavior that was incredibly damaging and shady.
I would like to think that I have a solid self-esteem. I am intelligent, attractive, kind, and generous of spirit. Why would I invest time and energy into someone who didn't deserve my light? Maybe it's a fixing complex. I see someone so damaged that I feel as if I should try and at least help them to be happier more centered people. Maybe it is the desire to make someone who is so obviously in the dark understand how wonderful life is--to see if from my perspective. Maybe it's because they tell me I am important to them or that they love me and I take it to heart, knowing that when I love someone it isn't transient so their love shouldn't be conditional either. I don't know. What I do know is that a narcissist, a manipulative, awesomely selfish person will take those caring, generous qualities about me and use them to their maximum. They will drain me and regardless of how solid or detached I am, I will end up hurting.
This has been a reoccurring theme in my life. Loving men and people who are incapable of loving back in the way I need. I am tired of loving broken things and broken people. It take s a massive toll on my personal energy and balance. I deserve to be well loved. I deserve to be respected. I deserve to have someone ask me how my day went, and sincerely listen to my answer because I am important to them. I deserve to be appreciated, desired, and more than any thing made to feel valued.
I know enough to understand that I do not need someone to complete me. I understand myself enough to know I don't even want to have someone on a daily basis. But I also recognize the need and desire in myself to have someone who wants to be in my life, who is unafraid to let me know that, and who take the time to appreciate everything that I do for them and give to them. I just want to be respected. To be valued.
I think I am going to have to be more judicious in the future of the people I allow in my life. I am too old to keep trying to fix people. I have so much to do and not enough time to do it in. Repairing broken people or things cannot be a priority for me. Fooling myself into thinking manipulation is care and love has no place either. My priorities lie elsewhere and I am too damned important to too many other people that I cannot allow my spirit to be diminished by anyone or anything that doesn't value it.
Thursday, October 19, 2017
I had my official observation today as part of my evaluation of my ability to teach. My lesson centered on defining opportunity cost and evaluating resource allocation with cost-benefit analyses. I tried my best to follow the style and format mandated by the district and I think, for the most part, I did alright. Nevertheless, I can tell already what areas will be targeted for improvement and what areas will be listed as strengths. If anything, I am pretty introspective about and fairly critical of the work I produce, and I constantly think about how I could be more efficient and more effective. I am open to constructive criticism and consistently try to improve my performance in the class room. However, I often struggle with trying to balance what my district views as a good teacher and what I believe is a good teacher.
I know that I have a prodigious amount of knowledge regarding American history, government and economics. Off the top of my head, I can answer almost any question about those subjects with depth, clarity, and detail. Content knowledge is definitely one of my greatest strengths. I am also strong in class room management and discipline. My students are invariably well-behaved. This too, is a strength.
Likewise, I know my area of greatest weakness. I am not well-versed on current pedagogy. Most of what I do in regard to teaching methodology I learned in my education classes, from expert teachers I worked with, or I developed through trial and error in the class room. I'll be the first to admit that I am not up-to-date on the most recent procedures and theories of classroom management or instruction. I try to be the district's "good" teacher and if one were to ask me to detail a lesson plan with anticipatory sets, closures, overt and covert thinking, imbedded assessment, aligned with common core state standards while using positive behavioral intervention strategies, I could do that-- just probably not very well.
I have my own ideas about methodology and procedure and they often don't follow current trends precisely. The thing about being current on new theories and procedures is that, in my opinion, a lot of them are variations on old themes. A lot of "new" ideas are just recycled old ideas in modern packaging. If the old version and language works and has been proven effective, why take the time to master the new version? To me, this is a monumental waste of time. Time that could be spent in a more productive fashion.
Many of these theories also would work well in a perfect world with perfect students, but the neither the world nor children are perfect. Especially when you teach in an alternative setting that serves students who don't fit well into the normal structure of public education. If fitting square pegs into round holes worked, my students wouldn't be attending my school. So perfecting strategies meant for the masses wastes time as well. I want to spend my time and energy on my students because they need it more than they need me to be expertly versed in pedagogical theory.
Because so many of my students have a history of some sort of trauma, it's imperative to create an environment that is welcoming, safe, and comfortable. This takes time and energy to manifest well. Another necessary aspect is building relationships with the students. There must be a consistent interaction of respect and acknowledgment that makes the students feel worthy, valued, and recognized, especially if they are going to learn anything meaningful in my classes. This also takes sustained conscious effort and time. In addition, students have to be given multiple opportunities for success, even the smallest of successes, so that they can change their personal narratives. Most of my students struggle with negative ideas about their intelligence, their ability to learn, their social skills, and their capacity for adding value to the world around them. Having real opportunities for success paired with authentic praise for that success can profoundly change how a child views him/herself and thus positively impact their learning ability.
I always keep in mind the idea so well-expressed by Maya Angelou with her quote, "At the end of the day people won't remember what you said or did, they will remember how you made them feel." I want my students to feel as if they matter, as if what they choose to do matters to the world, as if they could do anything they want to and to do it well. This all takes time, effort, and dedication. All of which would be diminished if I had to direct my attention to acquiring and fully applying "new" pedagogical practices.
Therefore, I am perfectly okay with my lack of expertise on trendy methodology and theories. I would much rather spend my time on what's really important for my students--teaching the whole person. Teaching them to love themselves, to value themselves. Teaching them to be resilient, confident, and sentient. Teaching them that they are worthy and worthwhile to this world. Teaching them ways that can help them develop into well-rounded, motivated, productive, and happy individuals. I am okay with being average in pedagogical form and practice. It is an opportunity cost I am willing to bear. I'd much rather allocate my resources to my students' growth and well-being than to my evaluation. At the end of the day, they are the most important things in education, and I am going to devote my resources, efforts, and time into helping them become the best versions of themselves they can possibly be.
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
Last night I went to bed thinking a lot of things, especially about the massacre in Las Vegas that happened Sunday night. Yet again, another mass shooting in the good ol' gun-loving US and yet again, the subsequent flurry of online "thoughts and prayers" for the victims. Very shortly afterwards, almost immediately actually, the propaganda both for and against gun control legislation began. I am well aware of the arguments, well aware of which side I am on and I am also very cognizant of how exhausted I am from having this same fight every few months.
I am definitely an advocate for responsible gun legislation. I don't want to take away anyone's Second Amendment right to bear arms, but I want controls in place that regulate gun ownership. The requirements for owning and operating a car, obtaining an abortion, or even applying for federal aid for college take more time, effort and regulation than gun ownership in the US. We are, as a nation, currently armed, dangerous, and definitely on edge. It's not a good combination for anyone living here.
Just in the last nine months alone, more than 11,500 Americans died due to guns. That's more than 1000 a month dead because of lax gun regulation and the glorification of gun ownership in the US. Some were accidents, some self-inflicted, some as the result of crime, and about 300 were due to mass shootings. More than 2500 teenagers/young adults were killed by guns. That figure is appalling. Why, as a people, are we okay with this level of loss of life?
I sincerely thought that after the 26 children and adults were killed at Newtown, Connecticut almost five years ago that Congress would begin the hard work of crafting sensible, meaningful public policy on gun ownership. How could they not? Babies were brutally gunned down in a safe space, kindergarten and first-grade classrooms. We as a compassionate, sentient nation of people wouldn't stand for something like this to happen again. But we did. And we continued to stand for more mass shootings, more horrific deaths of innocent people in public places. No where is safe anymore--not movie theaters, nightclubs, baseball games or concerts. Every time this happens, people mourn and commiserate, send thoughts and prayers, argue for and against their side, and ultimately do nothing at all. They purposely forget and willingly buy the bullshit propaganda of the NRA and the right who proclaim gun control legislation equates to gun confiscation.
The entire mess makes me angry and so very sad. I am frustrated that we are like Nero and fiddling while Rome burns. Until people are willing to allow for compromise, until people are willing to listen to reason and see the bigger picture, nothing will continue to happen except more mass murder, more unnecessary, violent deaths of the innocent.
As I fell asleep, I was struck by an odd thought. I wondered if, somewhere in the late 5th century, Romans realized that their civilization was rapidly coming to an end. And, if so, were there people trying to halt the ending or were they self-medicated, blinded if you will, by propaganda of the times? I also thought of how their incidents of violence, the disintegration of the ideals of a republic must have occurred more frequently. A societal variation of compressed morbidity that occurs as people age. Illness after illness come closer and closer until a person dies. I wondered if civilizations were like that as well. Violent episode after episode occurring more frequently and with greater impact until a society expires.
America is in peril led by an incompetent narcissist who sees nothing and understands nothing unless it directly relates to himself. We are experiencing greater division as a people, the like not seen since the Civil War. We are weak and unwilling to change, hiding from the hard work that needs to be done to continue striving for the goals laid out in our preamble to the Constitution....establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, and promoting the general welfare. From where I sit, we are in that period of compressed morbidity as a nation, and if we don't do something to stop its progression, the civilization that we know now won't be the same in the future. As a matter of fact, it may not be here at all.
Sunday, October 1, 2017
You are a bell before it's been rung-
the note of a song before it's been sung,
the tick of a clock before it times true;
You are potential, opportunity new.
You are a thought, not yet spoken-
a heartfelt promise still unbroken,
the rays of the sun peeping awake;
You are potential which no one can fake.
You are the eyes that open at dawn-
holding the moment before it is gone,
the sole drop of rain before the downpour;
You are potential and so much more.
that we parse from our days
to share with each other
With carefully crafted words
there is nothing random
in the way we speak, the things we say
It is a calculated distance,
this place we painstakingly leave
We hide from complication,
refuse to be vulnerable and
control what we can
Pushed on a tide of patience
that pools then ripples,
and breaks in wave upon wave
There is no space unfilled,
no deliberate disconnect
Just energy and eyes
An acknowledgment of kisses,
a recognition of the other and the us
that exists solely in stolen moments
Saturday, September 23, 2017
|Cell phones and creativity don't always mix.|
This past week, we held a poetry and music festival at the alternative high school where I work. Students created poems throughout the week, practiced songs they wanted to perform, and created accompanying art work for their words. Some of them were able to create poems of depth and meaning fairly easily, while others couldn't maintain the concentration necessary to write anything. I empathized with both types of writers. I used to write a lot of poetry throughout my late twenties and early thirties, but it dwindled down to almost nothing while I was in the thick of raising my kids and struggling to meet all my obligations as a wife and mother of young children. I couldn't find the time to reach that state of openness and quiet is that is necessary to take words and piece them together into something beautiful. For some reason, these students of mine cannot find that space either.
My lack of quiet space came from obligations to work and family--a fairly typical occurrence for someone my age and my place in life. My students' lack of space, however, can be attributed to the nature of today's technology-centered world. As teenagers, time should be one of their greatest assets, with enough of it to actually have blocks of it filled with nothing to do. Nevertheless, this is not the case. Every minute for them is filled, not only with typical adolescent thoughts, daydreams, and doubts, but with media, Youtube, music, and video games. Their lives are ones of non-stop sensory input which leaves very little room for creative output. A person doesn't need to exercise her imagination if someone else does it for her at the push of a button or the stroke of a keyboard. There is no room anymore for boredom and that develops into a distinct lack of ability to deal with the feelings that boredom manifests. I think there is a correlation between this and the high levels of anxiety I see in my students. They get used to constant entertainment, their entire lives having been an exercise in "bread and circuses" and don't know what to do with themselves when the immediate mental gratification stops.
Sometimes I think that technology and this culture of instant gratification is not only changing how we do things, but it's changing brain development as well. Who we are now as a people will definitely not match who we become in the future. Technology has not only become a daily tool for humanity, but an extension of oneself. For young people it's almost as if Decartes' definition of self has become "I have my phone, therefore I am." It worries me in regard to purely human-inspired artistic creativity. What's going to happen with traditional artistic endeavors? Are young people not going to be confident enough in their skills to make things without the help or inspiration of technology because they've never had to rely on just their own thoughts and ideas? It worries me because technology is so pervasive that it's not only changing young people, but everyone else as well.
I see changes in the way I think and the way in which I do things, and I attribute that to the constant presence of technology in my life as well. I have a shorter attention span and an increased need for consistent mental stimulation of some kind. And if technology has affected me this way, someone who has already been set and programmed a long time ago, what is it doing to young people who still have malleable minds? All people, including me, need to make time for more unplugged downtime. We need time to be bored. We need to sit with that boredom long enough to want to create something or do something productive that alleviates it. Having nothing to do or to think about has a way of opening one's mind to deeper thoughts, concentration, and creation of wonderful things.
I am definitely going to work on giving myself more opportunities for having time to do nothing. I need it to get back to more of who I used to be. And, if I am lucky, maybe in that nothing I will create something and it will be beautiful.
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
|Being a supportive friend isn't as easy as it seems. There is an art to it.|
I can't even comprehend what it must feel like to know that death is a real possibility due to illness. I think for most people who are in reasonable health, it's a concept we toy with occasionally, but quickly push to the back of our consciousness. It's a fear that most people don't examine in depth because it seems so very remote and so scary to contemplate that one day we will just be gone with no genuine idea of our destination from that point. I cannot imagine what it might feel like to have to face that reality.
I have a dear friend with a life-threatening illness. He's pretty young and has already had a close brush with death. He has children and family that care for him very much and who, I am sure, depend on him to be there. He has an abundance of friends who all seem to thoroughly enjoy his sense of humor, sarcasm and wit. He has a definite presence in this world. And the idea that he might die really scares me because a world without him will be a little less bright and a lot less interesting. I can only imagine (and not very well at that) how he must feel. In addition to that particular stress, the illness has caused him to be unable to work and do many things he previously enjoyed. The pressure he is under is intense.
That amount of stress and pressure can be isolating, especially if that person is someone who handles most of life's issues with introspection and self-reliance. No one in that person's immediate circle would really understand what kind of fear, doubt, uncertainty and anger that the ill friend would experience. Self-reliant people don't want sympathy and unless someone has been in those circumstances, empathy wouldn't apply. A lot of friends would want to be 100 percent positive and cheerful, but that too could be isolating and irritating for some people because it seems disingenuous. In situations like this, distance is created because no one is really sure how to act. The people who support a sick friend have to figure out how to do it right so that it will be meaningful, impactful, and appreciated. It's a really hard thing to determine which line to walk or which emotions and behaviors to balance. There is an art to being a supportive friend. One I have yet to fully master.
I will freely admit I am not very good at it. I want to be supportive. I want to be helpful. I want to be positive and stoic and fearless for him. What I really want is to fix the problem and make him healthy. In my efforts to be a good friend, I forgot that receiving support and help can be a hard thing to navigate as well and can cause undue stress on the person for whom it's intended. I think my attentions, which were well-intentioned, created a sense of expectation for thank yous or appreciation which in turn sapped energy from my friend who needs every ounce he has for healing.
Life is a learning process. I've never really loved someone who had a long-term illness, so figuring out how to be a good friend in this situation is new to me. I think, after a lot of reflection, I realize that I need to pay closer attention to the details, to listen to my intuition and his words, to not overstep my bounds, and to be very clear that the sole expectation I have is to help without any strings attached. A good friend is there when needed and wanted--no more, no less.
I am pretty confident that things are going to work out well. I am a firm believer in positive thinking and happy endings. I am also well aware of how strong, stubborn, and determined my friend is. The disease should be intimidated by him, not the other way around. As long as he wants me in his life and as much as I possibly can, I will be good friend and keep learning how to be a better one.
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
A healthy dose of competition goes a long way. I think for many people, it works as a motivator to do one's best at whatever endeavor they engage in. In addition, it adds an element of thrill or excitement to see who will come out on top. It lets people dance with the fear of losing or coming in second place to push them to become more emotionally invested in what they are trying to achieve. At it's most basic incarnation, it provides tangible proof that out of a field of rivals, one person is the best. Besides those things, winning feels good. It's nice to be able to say, I gave it my all and I prevailed.
Unfortunately, it also has a down side. For some people, winning can become everything. It morphs into the sole validation for one's worth and value. When this happens, people can become ruthless, calculating, and obnoxious. Unless a person has a healthy relationship with and an attitude towards competition, being competitive can cause more heartbreak than satisfaction. It is essential to have the right perspective about winning, losing, and trying one's best.
It's funny how life cycles through themes, but this week's theme seems to be about competition. Through conversations with my children and friends, the topic keeps popping up in one form or another. It's made me think more about it lately than I have in a long while. Somewhere along the line, the need to win fell way back on my list of priorities. I used to be incredibly competitive about most things. I wanted to be at the top of whatever I did. I won a lot of the time due to hard work and effort, but I lost frequently too. I used to get so upset when I lost--tears, doubt, anger--the whole nine yards. Thankfully, as I've aged, life became much more about the journey than the destination for me and constant competitiveness fell by the wayside.
My daughter who is fifteen and has a similar competitive streak as I did at that age recently auditioned for section leader for the band. She practiced not only her music on a daily basis, but spent hours writing and reviewing her interview questions. She has innate talent, but more importantly, she has a solid work ethic, especially when it comes to achieving goals for herself. Even with all her preparation and her confidence that she was going to perform at her greatest ability, she was prepared to lose gracefully. And that makes me very proud of her.
Some people might question why I would be proud of her to be prepared to lose. There is a school of thought that believes if a person makes room for the idea of losing, they have already lost. They believe that winning isn't everything, it's the only thing. I thoroughly disagree. I think evaluating what it might be like to win and to lose before it ever happens let's a person focus more on the experience than the objective and to frame how they will react to both outcomes. It makes you a winner at life, not just that particular test of skill.
Since they were very young, all of my children know that sometimes you just don't win, no matter how hard you try. No matter how talented a person is, someone out there could be better. The only thing to do is to give 100 percent of what they can do and wait for the results. Win or lose, if they did their best they could be proud. I wanted them to know early on that it is the effort that matters most, not the achievement. I want them to be champions at life, not just soccer, or band, or school work. Learning to be resilient in the face of defeat, gracious in both winning and losing, and confident in their attempts means more to me than any trophy, position, or grade. Winning is nice, but it isn't everything. Learning from your mistakes, acknowledging and appreciating skill or talent beyond your own, motivating yourself to work harder and smarter for the next test of skill, and being completely present in the moment no matter how painful it might be are all much more important than winning.
As section leader next school year, I know my daughter will continue to strive for excellence because it is something she wants to do for herself and for her band family, not solely for external validation. She will still be competitive, but mostly with herself, I am sure. Just like her Momma, she wants to be a little bit better tomorrow than she was today, and frankly that's the most productive and fruitful kind of competition of all.